|
Exercise Delivery Status for Course Participants
R means received if I am far behind evaluating exercises.
| Name\Lesson | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | Average |
|---|
| dhjpi, David Hjort Pii |
99% | 100% | 100% | 96% |
94% | 100% | 95% | 100% |
100% | 100% | 87% | 100% | 97.6% |
| hgeer, Henrik Marcus Geertz-Hansen |
93% | 97% | 90% | 98% |
100% | 98% | 94% | 98% |
95% | 93% | 100% | 101% | 96.4% |
| jbeje, Jakob Berg Jespersen |
99% | 101% | 100% | 100% |
96% | 100% | 98% | 100% |
93% | 72% | 98% | 100% | 96.4% |
| kagjo, Katrine Grimstrup Joensen |
96% | 100% | 98% | 100% |
96% | | | |
| | | | 40.8% |
| Kalliopi Tsafou |
100% | 100% | 91% | 99% |
88% | 90% | 95% | 79% |
91% | 95% | 95% | | 85.2% |
| kgko, Kristine Grønning Kongsbak |
98% | 97% | 99% | 100% |
93% | 91% | 96% | 100% |
97% | 86% | 97% | 100% | 96.2% |
| mvand, Mads Valdemar Anderson |
101% | 100% | 96% | 100% |
100% | 93% | 86% | 96% |
100% | | 100% | 100% | 89.3% |
| nikhn, Nikolaj Hansen |
100% | 97% | 100% | 94% |
- | 83% | 93% | 93% |
98% | 90% | 92% | 95% | 86.2% |
| s052747, Niels Danneskiold-Samsøe |
- | 99% | 100% | 92% |
95% | 94% | 98% | 94% |
97% | 81% | | | 70.8% |
| s061284, Mads Jacob Kirkegaard |
98% | 99% | 97% | 86% |
75% | 86% | | |
| | | | 45.1% |
| s071926, Martin Christen Frølund Thomsen |
99% | 100% | 97% | 96% |
100% | 93% | 96% | 100% |
100% | 96% | 100% | 97% | 97.8% |
| s071932, Maja Skovbjerg Knudsen |
90% | 90% | 92% | 94% |
85% | | | |
| | | | 37.6% |
| s072252, Troels Hels Rasmussen |
101% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
95% | - | 99% | 90% |
90% | 85% | 101% | 100% | 88.4% |
| s082412, Klaus Højgaard Jensen |
88% | 95% | 101% | 88% |
99% | 92% | 98% | 96% |
88% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 95.0% |
| s082414, Jessica Xin Hu |
98% | 98% | 93% | 97% |
93% | 98% | 92% | 86% |
90% | 82% | 100% | 95% | 93.5% |
| s082427, Mark Thomas Østerlund |
- | 93% | 99% | 78% |
93% | - | 87% | |
94% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 69.9% |
| s082430, Johanne Ahrenfeldt |
100% | 98% | 91% | 95% |
96% | 90% | 101% | 100% |
96% | 67% | 97% | 98% | 94.1% |
| s082440, Jane Lind Nybo Rasmussen |
100% | 100% | 100% | 91% |
93% | 93% | 95% | 97% |
93% | 74% | 87% | 80% | 91.9% |
| s082495, Jacob Hellum Nielsen |
95% | 100% | 91% | 86% |
- | 91% | 20% | |
| | | | 40.2% |
| s083350, Thor Bech Johannesen |
100% | 99% | 98% | 85% |
100% | 92% | 98% | 94% |
96% | 80% | 101% | 98% | 95.1% |
| s083490, Jens Christian Frøslev Nielsen |
99% | 100% | 96% | 97% |
98% | 97% | 98% | 93% |
100% | 95% | 97% | 100% | 97.5% |
| s091825, Katarzyna Anna Chyzynska |
100% | 94% | 93% | 83% |
90% | 95% | 72% | 100% |
100% | 57% | 70% | 98% | 87.7% |
| s092765, Maria Dalby |
99% | 99% | 93% | 95% |
94% | 98% | 98% | 99% |
100% | 81% | 91% | 95% | 95.2% |
| s092774, Katrine Højholt Kristensen |
98% | 100% | 93% | 95% |
94% | 94% | 97% | 100% |
96% | 85% | 97% | 97% | 95.5% |
| s092791, Jeppe Bang Schou Jensen |
25% | 100% | 100% | 95% |
68% | 55% | 83% | 90% |
96% | 53% | 35% | 100% | 75.0% |
| s093629, David Westergaard |
98% | 101% | 100% | 98% |
98% | 96% | 100% | 100% |
100% | 98% | 100% | 97% | 98.8% |
| s100157, Tsonko Marinov Tsonkov |
97% | 100% | 99% | 95% |
94% | 93% | 96% | 91% |
98% | 95% | 92% | 100% | 95.8% |
| s102685, Simon Koplev |
100% | 100% | 91% | 100% |
90% | 99% | 99% | 91% |
98% | 94% | 100% | 98% | 96.7% |
| s102848, Pascal Timshel |
101% | 96% | 100% | 99% |
98% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 99.1% |
| s102864, Kristian Jensen |
97% | 100% | 99% | 100% |
96% | 98% | 92% | 100% |
100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 98.2% |
| s102872, Anders Bech Bruntse |
100% | 98% | 92% | 87% |
80% | 93% | 93% | 93% |
100% | 80% | 95% | 95% | 92.2% |
| s102877, Michael Schantz Klausen |
100% | 99% | 100% | 100% |
98% | 98% | 92% | 99% |
| 100% | 92% | 101% | 89.9% |
| s102945, Søren Dalsgård Petersen |
99% | 99% | 101% | 100% |
98% | 94% | 100% | 98% |
100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 98.9% |
| s104195, Kasper Drenck |
100% | 100% | 100% | 77% |
- | 60% | - | 82% |
- | - | | | 43.2% |
| s112098, Athanasios Zervas |
100% | 94% | 85% | 97% |
89% | 77% | - | 100% |
- | 67% | 100% | | 67.4% |
| s114445, Anna Molencka |
98% | 101% | 100% | 100% |
100% | 98% | 97% | 93% |
97% | 90% | 100% | 100% | 97.8% |
| s114906, Simranjeet Kaur |
90% | 65% | 88% | 56% |
62% | 55% | - | 73% |
90% | 85% | 20% | 100% | 65.3% |
| s114916, Nikolaj Sørensen |
100% | 100% | 100% | 98% |
100% | 86% | 98% | 100% |
101% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 98.3% |
The percentage you gain here is not directly translateable into (part of) a grade.
If an exercise fulfills the stated text and solves the given problem(s), then it is graded 100%.
However, the quality of the solution can be both good and bad at 100%. The feedback you gain
during the course should tell you where you stand, and what problems there has been with your
exercise (if any), and how to improve.
The teachers solutions should always be checked, since a lot of feedback are contained therein.
It is possible to get 101% in exercises. It is given if a complete exercise
shows flawless code with good optimized structure, taking in possible
error situations, and explaining how to use the programs.
|
