Events News Research CBS CBS Publications Bioinformatics
Staff Contact About Internal CBS CBS Other

Article abstract


REFERENCE

Analysis and recognition of 5' UTR intron splice sites in human pre-mRNA.
E. Eden and S. Brunak.
Nucleic Acids Research, 33:1131-1142, 2004.

Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum-DTU, The Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

PMID: 14960723


ABSTRACT

Prediction of splice sites in non-coding regions of genes is one of the most challenging aspects of gene structure recognition. We perform a rigorous analysis of such splice sites embedded in human 5' UTR regions, and investigate correlations between this class of splice sites and other features found in the adjacent exons and introns. By restricting the training of neural network algorithms to 'pure' untranslated regions (not extending partially into protein coding regions), we for the first time investigate the predictive power of the splicing signal proper in contrast to conventional splice site prediction, which typically rely on the change in sequence at the transition from protein coding to non-coding. By doing so the algorithms were able to pick up subtler splicing signals that were otherwise masked by 'coding' noise thus enhancing significantly the prediction of 5' UTR splice sites. For example, the non-coding splice site predicting networks pick up compositional and positional bias in the 3' ends of non-coding exons and 5' non-coding intron ends, where cytosine and guanine are overrepresented. This compositional bias at the true UTR donor sites is also visible in the synaptic weights of the neural networks trained to identify UTR donor sites. Conventional splice site prediction methods perform poorly in UTR regions, because the reading frame pattern is absent. The NetUTR method presented here performs 2-3 fold better compared to NetGene2 and GenScan in 5' UTR regions. We also tested the 5' UTR trained method on protein coding regions, and discovered surprisingly that it works quite well (although it cannot compete with NetGene2). This indicates that the local splicing pattern in UTR and coding regions largely is the same.



CORRESPONDENCE

Søren Brunak,