Method # 1: Absorbance of DNA
Method # 2: DNA micro-chip technology
Method
# 3: Gel Electrophoresis
The discussion will still follow (kind of) the outline from the text:
5.7
The Isolation & Characterisation of
Particular DNA Fragments
5.8 The Polymerase Chain Reaction
5.9
Determination of the Sequence of
Bases in DNA
First, a few words about the UV Absorbance of DNA, and how you can easily monitor whether the DNA is double-stranded or single-stranded (or even triple-stranded for that matter, but this is a topic for another lecture...)
This is kind of an ugly
picture of double-stranded DNA (scanned in from my lab notebook), but you
can see that the peak is very close to 260 nm. (Actually, very pure DNA
should have a lambda max. around 257 nm.)

How
do I know what the concentration is?
| An A260 of 1.0 = 50 mg/ml concentration of DNA. |
| An A260 of 1.0 = 50 mg/ml
concentration of DNA |
| Extinction coefficient, e260 = 6100 mol-1l-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| e260= 233,970 mol-1l-1 |

| [DNA] = 290 mg/ml |
| [oligomer] 37.6 mM
( 37.6 micromoles of oligomer per liter) |
DNA Absorbance and melting of the double strand
The Absorbance of DNA increases as it melts
Figure 5.28, page 200 in Hartl & Jones
Different organisms have different G+C contents...
This difference in G+C can be seen in the densities of different DNA:

And the %G+C is also seen by different melting curves:
For Bacteria, the melting curves are all pretty much the same, except
for the difference due to G+C content. However, the melting curves
for eukaryotes can be quite different, as can be seen by a comparison of
E.coli DNA with DNA extracted from a cow.
This difference in melting curves (actually, renaturation curves)
is due to the presence of repetative sequences within the genome of cow
DNA. By melting the DNA and then measuring the rate of renaturation,
it is possible to estimate the complexity of the genome for the cow (or
whatever other organism you want...)

.
This analysis was extended to many different types of organisms, with the following (now famous) result:
Figure 6.17 (page 238 from Hartl & Jones)
Method
# 2: DNA micro-chip technology
Recently, small DNA oligomers have been attached to micro-chips, and
used to probe for the presence of complimentary DNA in bacteria by hybridization.
Here is an abstract for a recent article.
Nat Biotechnol 1998 Jan;16(1):45-48 Bacterial transcript imaging by hybridization of total RNA to oligonucleotide arrays. de Saizieu A, Certa U, Warrington J, Gray C, Keck W, Mous J Pharma Division, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
We have used high-density oligonucleotide probe arrays (chips) for bacterial
PMID: 9447592, UI: 98108853 |
These arrays have been postulated to be capable of analysis of complete
genomes:
| Bioessays 1996 May;18(5):427-431
Genome analysis with gene expression microarrays. Schena M Department of Biochemistry, Beckman Center, Stanford University Medical
Advances in biochemistry, chemistry and engineering have enabled the development of a new gene expression assay. This 'chip-based' approach utilizes microscopic arrays of cDNAs printed on glass as high-density hybridization targets. Fluorescent probe mixtures derived from total cellular messenger RNA (mRNA) hybridize to cognate elements on the array, allowing accurate measurement of the expression of the corresponding genes. Array densities of > 1,000 cDNAs per cm2 enable quantitative expression monitoring of a large number of genes in a single hybridization. A two-color fluorescence detection scheme allows rapid and simultaneous differential expression analysis of independent biological samples. Mass-produced microarrays provide a new tool for genome expression analysis that may revolutionize genetic dissection, drug discovery and human disease diagnostics. Publication Types: Review
PMID: 8639166, UI: 96220674 |
![]() |
| Photolithographic techniques inspired by the semiconductor
industry are the basis for preparing high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Shown here is a 1.28x1.28cm array of more than 10,000 different nucleotide
sequences (probes), which was then incubated with a cloned fragment (the
target) from the genome of the HIV-1 virus. If the fluorescently labeled
target contained a region complementary to a sequence in the array, the
target hybridized with the probe, the extent of the hybridization depending
on the extent of the match. This false-color image depicts different levels
of detected fluorescence from the bound target fragments. Techniques such
as this may ultimately be used in sequencing applications, as well as in
exploring genetic diversity, probing for mutations, and detecting specific
pathogens. Photo courtesy of Affymetrix.
Link
to the page this came from:
|
How can they possibly make such a fine grid with DNA oligomers?
One way is to use a GRIDDER robot, such as this one from the Sanger
centre in England (that's why "center" is spelt funny!)
|
What Is It...? The gridder makes high density arrays (grids) of spots onto nylon membrane filters. These spots can be cosmid, YAC, BAC or DNA. High density arrays mean that several microtitre plates can be represented on a single 80mm x 128mm filter, e.g. with a 4x4 pattern 16 plates are condensed onto a single filter. (I guess I should give a few definitions, since we haven't covered this yet in lecture - a cosmid is a large piece of viral DNA, YAC = Yeast Artificial Chromosomes; BAC = Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes) |
Here is an extract of a 6x6 pattern using a 96-pin tool. The pattern
only contains 32 spots rather than the maximum 36, the missing spots are
used to make the pattern easier to read.
![]() |
How Does It Do It...?The gridder is built on the Flexible Robot platform. The set up looks something like this: Here you can see the 96-pin tool on the end of the Z axis and two freezer
trays on the bed of the robot, one holding master plates, the other holding
output filters. To the right of the freezer trays is a fixture holding
an ethanol bath for sterilisation.
|
The gridder
uses a tool comprising 96 or 384 floating pins. These are arranged on 9mm
or 4.5mm centres to suit standard plasticware. The pins are guided by two
PTFE loaded nylon guide plates to provide the accurate guiding and low
friction needed to produce high quality, high density patterns.
This is what it looks like...you can see the 96 floating pins and the
filters.
|
Where Can I Get One...?If you're from the Sanger Centre or any of the other institutions on the Hinxton Hall site then come down to the Engineering Group in the workshop.If you're looking at this from a site other than Hinxton Hall then contact PBA Technology via their web page. |
|
Rob Davies (rmd@sanger.ac.uk)
Last Update 16 July 1996
|
This technology has now allowed for the rapid evolutionary analysis
within different organisms:
![]() letters Evolutionary sequence comparisons
using high-density oligonucleotide arrays
1National Human Genome Research Institute, Building 49/3A14, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 2National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 3Affymetrix, 3380 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, California 95051, USA. Correspondence should be addressed to F.S.C. e-mail: fc23a@nih.gov We explored the utility of high-density oligonucleotide arrays (DNA chips) for obtaining sequence information from homologous genes in closely related species. Orthologues of the human BRCA1 exon 11, all approximately 3.4 kb in length and ranging from 98.2% to 83.5% nucleotide identity, were subjected to hybridization-based and conventional dideoxysequencing analysis. Retrospective guidelines for identifying high-fidelity hybridization-based sequence calls were formulated based upon dideoxysequencing results. Prospective application of these rules yielded base-calling with at least 98.8% accuracy over orthologous sequence tracts shown to have approximately 99% identity. For higher primate sequences with greater than 97% nucleotide identity, base-calling was made with at least 99.91% accuracy covering a minimum of 97% of the sequence. Using a second-tier confirmatory hybridization chip strategy, shown in several cases to confirm the identity of predicted sequence changes, the complete sequence of the chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan orthologues should be deducible solely through hybridization-based methodologies. Analysis of less highly conserved orthologues can still identify conserved nucleotide tracts of at least 15 nucleotides and can provide useful information for designing primers. DNA-chip based assays can be a valuable new technology for obtaining high-throughput cost-effective sequence information from related genomes.
|
Here's an advertisement for a company, using DNA chip technology:
|
|
Method # 3: Gel Electrophoresis
Gel electrophoresis allows for the seperation of DNA molecules based
on their size.
Restriction
Enzymes
Restriction enzymes cut DNA at specific sequences. Here's a few
examples...
Restriction mapping:
these enzymes can be used to map a given DNA sequence
Southern Blots




note that you can also use fluorescently labelled DNA - it does not
HAVE
to be radioactively labelled!
note that your DNA is a smear, because you have lots of different
fragments - you want to only see a few bands (hopefully) with your probe.
To transfer the DNA from the gel to the membrane, usually a "sandwich"
is made as follows:
The gel is usually then thrown away. I like to use pre-stained
markers, so I can make sure that the DNA transfers to the filter.
The "Seal-a-Meal" bag is not essential, but you certainly want to be careful not to leak radioactive stuff all over the lab!! Sometimes the filter will be put in a "roller bottle" and then hybridised in an oven. I think the oven kind of looks like a "hot dog cooker".

FINALLY, you remove the liquid containing the probe, and (carefully)
wash the membrane. Hopefully you'll see some bands on the film (next
step).
Usually the membrane is exposed to film overnight or so....
Here is a typical example of a Southern blot. YES, it looks ugly.
Most of the time they look this ugly or worse! But, the important
thing is that you can see your bands, so to the poor person who did this
experiment, it probably looks "beautiful"!
| Type of blot | Substrate | Probe |
| Southern | DNA | piece of DNA
(single-stranded) |
| Northern | RNA | piece of DNA or RNA
(single-stranded) |
| Western | Protein | Antibody (usually) |
5.8 The Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure 5.36 in Hartl & Jones, 1998 (page 209).
There are may different types of PCR, including the use of reverse transcriptase to make a DNA from an RNA molecule, ("RT-PCR") but these will be the topics of future discussion....
5.9
Determination of the Sequence of
Bases in DNA
Here
is a EXCELLENT link forPresently
there are three - no, FOUR (maybe FIVE) methods for DNA
sequencing:
2. Fred Sanger's method (dideoxy method)
3. AUTOMATED sequencing (dideoxy, using fluorescent tags)
5. Sequencing of individual bases (at the atomic level!)
The advances in methodologies can be seen in the increase in sequencing
power. The human genome is roughly 3,000,000,000 bp long. Below
is a table where I have very roughly estimated the length of time it would
take to sequence the human genome, based on the number of bp that have
been sequenced in a given year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link to a more recent list of sequenced genomes
Link to lecture notes from Autumn 1999
Now a bit more about each method of sequencing:
1. Maxam & Gilbert's method (chemical cleavage)
Yes, the Maxam Gilbert gels often will look this ugly!

2. Fred Sanger's method (dideoxy method)





Click here for a sample protocol for CHEMILUMINESCENT DNA SEQUENCING
3. AUTOMATED sequencing
(dideoxy, using fluorescent tags)
4. DNA-chip sequencing (currently being developed)

5. Sequencing of individual
bases (at the atomic level!)

Approach # 2 - fluorescence
energy transfer from individual
DNA bases
|
Sequencing based on the detection of fluorescence from single molecules is being pursued at Los Alamos. The strand of DNA to be sequenced is replicated using nucleotides linked to a fluorescent tag -- a different tag for each of the four nucleotides. The tagged strand is then attached to a polystyrene bead suspended in a flowing stream of water, and the nucleotides are enzymatically detached, one at a time. Laser-excited fluorescence then yields the nucleotide sequence, base by base. Much development remains to be done on this technique, but success promises a cheaper, faster approach to sequencing, one that might be applicable to intact cosmid clones 40,000 bases long. |
![]()
Alaskan Victim of 1918 Flu Yields Sample of Killer Virus (11-Feb-98)

Last modified on: 1 February, 2000 by Dave Ussery