Biology 210
GENETICS
13 February,1998

I. The Problem: DNA Compaction
Three aspects of DNA compaction in bacteria:II. What IS "curved DNA"?
A. FlexibilityC.Intrinsic DNA curvature
B. DNA supercoiling
- Toroidal supercoils from proteins ("restrained" supercoils)
- Plectonemic supercoils ("unrestrained")
B. Models for intrinsic DNA curvature
B. psbA2 regulation in cyanobacteria
C. mapping DNA curvature in complete genomes
note: This is based on a lecture that was originally given as a "keynote" talk on the first day of a week-long EMBO Workshop on Nucleoid-Associated Proteins: Structure, Function & Genetics, in Camerino, Italy, in May, 1997. This was actually meant to be the first part of an introduction or overview of DNA/protein interactions in bacterial chromatin. I discussed the "DNA" part, and Professor Andrew Travers (from the MRC in Cambridge) talked about bacterial chromatin-associated proteins and their binding to DNA. The references and questions are from a "Workshop on DNA Structure & Function" I gave in Oslo, Norway, during the 1996/1997 academic year.
I.
The Problem Stated: DNA Compaction
|
This is a famous electron micrograph of an E. coli cell that has been carefully lysed, then all the proteins were removed, and it was spread on an EM grid to reveal all of its DNA. This is the same picture as the background for this page, and also is the same as Figure 6.3 (page 227 in Hartl & Jones, 1998). |
The length of a typical bacterial operon (usually about 3 genes), is about as long as the entire bacterial cell, if it is stretched out in its B-DNA double helical conformation!

Three aspects of DNA compaction in bacteria:
A.
Flexibility
There are two different ways of looking at DNA flexibility:
1. Persistence length of DNA - this is relatively non-specific, and just has to do with the overall "rigidity" of DNA. On average, DNA has a persistance length of about 44 nm, which is quite a bit longer than proteins. One way of thinking about this is that proteins tend to fold up into little spheres (I like to say "blobs"), and DNA is a bit more rigid.
Description of persistence length. This
is taken from Cantor and Schimmel, Biophysical Chemistry, page 1012 (W.H.Freeman
& Co., San Fransisco, 1980).
The
point of all this is that, on average DNA has a persistence length
of about 130 bp, and this is quite a bit longer than proteins.
The measured values for persistence length have been found to depend several
environmental factors, such as temperature and concentration of salt.
So the value of the persistence length for DNA is usually in the range
of 120 to 150 bp, depending on the conditions of the experiment.
My own personal opinion is that inside bacterial cells, the persistence
length is probably around 140 bp.
DNA (ave.)
polyglycine poly-L-valine
<---------->
<->
<----->
a = 44 nm
a = 0.6 nm
a = 22 nm
(about 130 bp)
However, the DNA persistence length varies with sequence, and can be quite large for certain sequences:
(A5N10)n
<------------------------>
a =
80 nm
(about 235 bp)
where (A5N10)n is the following sequence:
5' GGCCCAAAAAGGCCGGGCCCAAAAAGGCCGGGCCCAAAAAGGCCGGGCCC...3'
Thus, a few specific DNA sequences can be quite rigid, with a persistence
length that is almost twice as long as that for an average DNA molecule.
For other DNA sequences, the persistence length can be much lower
than the average - these sequences are said to be very "flexible" - for
example, regions such as ...TATATA... can substantially reduce the rigidity
of the helix. Why is the persistence so much longer for certain DNA
sequences? Part of the answer from this will come when we talk about
curved DNA (below).
Figure 2 from P.A. Rice, S. Yan, K. Mizuuchi, and H.A. Nash, Cell, 87:1295-1306, (1996). Notice the yellow proline at the tip of each arm intercalates between the DNA bases.

It is quite impressive that this protein induces a bend of 180 degrees into a DNA helix. On the other hand, when you consider that the DNA must be compacted more than a thousand fold in the cell, it is probably not that suprising that
I
recently read a review article of DNA/protein crystal structures; our of
more than 100 different structures characterised, nearly all of them distorted
or bent the DNA helix (some more so than others, obviously!).
B. DNA supercoiling
Introduction
and Historical background
Supercoiled plasmid DNA
| This is an agarose gel run to analyse different levels of DNA supercoiling of a 3000 bp piece of circular DNA. I have marked the "linear", "relaxed", and supercoiled ("s.c.") bands. Notice that the supercoiled DNA runs much faster than the linear, whilst the relaxed DNA runs much slower than the linear. In most gels the supercoiled DNA will run quite a bit faster than the linear, although the relative positions of the three forms depends on the particular type of gel you run. (This particular gel was a 1.75% agarose gel, run in "topo-style" TAE buffer, at 3 V/cm for 14 hours.)
|
|
Historically, early scientists were surprised to find that a single DNA molecule could have three different types of conformations:
DNA that is circular can be either "relaxed" or "supercoiled". The supercoiled form is much more compact. (These pictures are not drawn to scale - see the EM picture below!)

There are two types of supercoiling:
|
Characteristics of plectonemically supercoiled DNA ("unrestrained")
b. Wr/DTw is constant and about 3 c. length is independent of s and is ~40% of the couture length. d. the superhelix diameter varies with s at "physiological levels" of s, the superhelix axis is extremely sensitive to small changes in supercoiling. e. the number of supercoils is directly proportional to |s| and is Å 0.9DLk
Two other (theoretical, not (yet) verified experimentally)
properties:
|
|
|
2.Toroidal supercoils ("restrained" by proteins)
b. writhe and twist may vary, e.g., they're not "linked". c. length becomes shorter with more turns. d. usually involved with proteins - often wrapping. |
NOTE THAT the plectonemic & torroidal molecules are drawn to scale
- that is, the torroidal supercoiling is much more efficient at compacting
the DNA.
Inside a bacterial cell, both types of supercoiling are present.
We have done experiments to measure unrestrained supercoiling in plasmid DNA (small circles of about 3000 bp), and have found that very close to half of the supercoils are constraned by proteins in vivo. A cartoon of a the distribution of supercoiling in a 3000 bp plasmid is shown below. If you were to strip off all of the proteins, and measure the supercoiling, there would be 20 supercoils in this plasmid. Most DNA isolated from E.coli has roughly this level of supercoiling.

In
terms of numbers of molecules, the most abundant proteins in E.coli
are the "histone-like" proteins. There are four main types that have
been well characterised, as shown in the table below.
| Protein | Subnit
structure |
subunit
MW (kDa) |
Function (?) | Gene(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the amount can vary, depending on the conditions of the experiment, there can be as much as 100,000 copies of each of these proteins in the bacterial cell. This is pretty high, considering that there's estimated to be roughly only a million protein molecules total in E.coli - so perhaps as much as 30% to 40% of the total proteins are bound up with DNA. In both bacteria and eukaryotes, the DNA is compacted about 1000x, and the isolated chromatin contains roughly equal mass of DNA:protein. However, in eukaryotes (unlike bacteria), the chromatin forms a stable DNA/protein complex. It is likely that this difference could be reflective of the huge difference in percentage of the genome that codes for protein - more than 90% in bacteria vs. only about 2% in humans.
DNA can be either positive
or negatively supercoiled
negatively
supercoiled DNA

Somre more properties of Supercoiled DNA
Geometric Properties of Supercoiled DNA
A "geometric property" may change under deformation,
and can be described by quantities that specify size and shape.
2. Twist - this
is the number of turns of the DNA helix - this is related to, (but not
quite the same as) the number of bp/turn.
A "topological property" is one that remains unchanged
under continuous deformations. Topological properties are usually quantized,
often to integral values. Topological properties require a beginning and
an end.
Supercoiling is a geometric property. s
works best to described unrestrained supercoiling.
note that the free energy is related to the square of
the linking number difference. The result of this is that, in topA cells,
the energy from unrestrained supercoils is nearly twice that available
in wt cells.
REFERENCES
on DNA Supercoiling
(a few, selected from
2215 refs.!)
I. Significance
a. Transcription - a few good overview papers:
"Hyper-negative template DNA supercoiling during transcription of the tetracycline-resistance gene in topA mutants is largely constrained in vivo", Albert, A.C., Spirito, F., Figueroabossi, N., Bossi, L., and Rahmouni, A.R., Nucleic Acids Res, 24: 3093-3099, (1996).
"Differential control of transcription-induced and overall DNA supercoiling by eukaryotic topoisomerases in vitro", Wang, Z.Y. and Droge, P., EMBO Journal, 15: 581-589, (1996).
"A sequence-induced superhelical DNA segment serves as transcriptional enhancer", Brahms, G., Brahms, S., and Magasanik, B., Journal Of Molecular Biology, 246: 35-42, (1995).
"Hypernegative supercoiling of the DNA-template during transcription elongation in vitro", Drolet, M., Bi, X., and Liu, L.F., Journal Of Biological Chemistry, 269: 2068-2074, (1994).
"The regulation of transcription and DNA supercoiling - a correlation between promoter strength and the antitermination ability of mutant gyrA promoters in Escherichia coli",Krah, R., Gellert, M., and Menzel, R., J Cell Biochem, 1994: 62, (1994).
"Transcription and DNA
supercoiling", J. Wang & A.S. Lynch, Current Opinions in Genetics
and Development, 3:764-768, (1993).
b. Virulence - some good reviews:
"Flexible response - DNA supercoiling, transcription and bacterial adaptation to environmental-stress", Dorman, C.J., Trends Microbiol, 4: 214-216, (1996).
"DNA topology and the global control of bacterial gene-expression - Implications for the regulation of virulence gene-expression", Dorman, C.J., Microbiology-Uk, 141: 1271-1280, (1995).
"Global regulatory mechanisms affect virulence gene-expression in Bordetella pertussis", Graeffwohlleben, H., Deppisch, H., and Gross, R., Mol Gen Genet, 247: 86-94, (1995).
"DNA topology and bacterial
virulence gene regulation", C.J. Dorman & N.N.Bhriain, Trends in
Microbiology, 1:92-99, (1993).
c. Evolution - Many of the specific loci in pathogenic bacteria that are prone towards mutagenesis may involve DNA topology-mediated/driven changes.
"The unusual structures of the hot-regions flanking large-scale deletions in human mitochondrial-DNA", Hou, J.H. and Wei, Y.H., Biochem J, 318: 1065-1070, (1996).
"Supercoiling and map stability in the bacterial chromosome", Charlebois, R.L. and Stjean, A., Journal Of Molecular Evolution, 41: 15-23, (1995).
"Adaptive evolution of
highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria", Moxon,E.R., Rainey,P.B., Nowak,M.A.,
Lenski,R.E., Current Biology, 4:24-33, (1994).
d. Alternative DNA structures/ opening the DNA helix
"Flow of structural information between four DNA conformational levels", Levinzaidman, S., Reich, Z., Wachtel, E.J., and Minsky, A., Biochemistry, 35: 2985-2991, (1996).
"Action at a distance in supercoiled DNA - effects of sequence on slither, branching, and intramolecular concentration", Sprous, D. and Harvey, S.C., Biophysical Journal, 70: 1893-1908, (1996).
"Formation of a combined H-DNA/open TATA box structure in the promoter sequence of the human Na,K-ATPase a2 gene", Potaman, V.N., Ussery, D.W., and Sinden, R.R., Journal Of Biological Chemistry, 271: 13441-13447, (1996).
"Analysis of left-handed Z-DNA formation in short d(CG)n sequences in Escherichia coli and Halobacterium halobium plasmids - stabilization by increasing repeat length and DNA supercoiling but not salinity", Kim, J., Yang, C.F., and Dassarma, S., J Biol Chem, 271: 9340-9346, (1996).
"Large-scale opening of A+T rich regions within supercoiled DNA-molecules is suppressed by salt", Bowater, R.P., Aboulela, F., and Lilley, D.M.J., Nucleic Acids Res, 22: 2042-2050, (1994).
van Holde,K., Zlatanova,J., "Unusual DNA Structures, Chromatin and Transcription", BioEssays, 16:59-65, (1994).
"Local supercoil-stabilized
DNA structures", Palecek, E., Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 26,
151-226, (1991).
II. Historical Background
"Physical and topological
properties of circular DNA", Vinograd,J., Lebowitz,J., J. Gen. Physiol.,
49:103-125, 1966.
III. Characteristics of DNA Supercoiling
A good, simple review can be found in:
"Supercoiled DNA: Biological
Significance", Sinden,R.R., Journal of Chemical Education, 64:294-301,
(1987).
A good small text, for those who are more interested:
"DNA Topology,Bates,A.D.,
Maxwell,A., (IRL Press, Oxford, 1993).
A good reference on the geometric and topological properties of supercoiled DNA:
Primer on the Topology
and Geometry of DNA Supercoiling", from Cozzarelli,N.R., Boles,T.C., DNA
Topology and its Biological Effects, (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press, 1990).
some other reviews (although a bit theoretical):
Structure and energetics of plectonemically supercoiled DNA, Lahiri, A., Biopolymers, 34: 799-804, (1994).
"Structure of Plectonemically
Supercoiled DNA", Boles,T.C., White,J.H., Cozzarelli,N.R., Journal of
Molecular Biology, 213:931-951, (1990).
IV. Influences of DNA Supercoiling on Intrinsic DNA curvature
1. Carmona, M. and Magasanik, B., Activation of transcription at s54 dependent promoters on linear templates requires intrinsic or induced bending of the DNA, J Mol Biol, 261: 348-356, (1996).
2. Heath, P.J., Clendenning, J.B., Fujimoto, B.S., and Schurr, J.M., Effect of bending strain on the torsion elastic-constant of DNA, Journal Of Molecular Biology, 260: 718-730, (1996).
3. Langowski, J., Olson, W.K., Pedersen, S.C., Tobias, I., Westcott, T.P., and Yang, Y., ÒDNA supercoiling, localized bending and thermal fluctuationsÓ, Trends In Biochemical Sciences, 21: 50, (1996).
4. Lutter, L.C., Halvorson, H.R., and Calladine, C.R., Topological measurement of protein-induced DNA bend angles, J Mol Biol, 261: 620-633, (1996).
5. Parekh, B.S. and Hatfield, G.W., Transcriptional activation by protein-induced DNA bending - evidence for a DNA structural transmission model, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences (USA), 93: 1173-1177, (1996).
6. White, J.H., Lund, R.A., and Bauer, W.R., Twist, writhe, and geometry of a dna loop containing equally spaced coplanar bends, Biopolymers, 38: 235-250, (1996).
8. Diekmann, S. and Langowski, J., Supercoiling couples DNA curvature to the overall shape and the internal motion of the DNA molecule in solution, Theochem, 336: 227-234, (1995).
9. Klenin, K.V., Frankkamenetskii, M.D., and Langowski, J., Modulation of intramolecular interactions in superhelical DNA by curved sequences - a monte-carlo simulation studyÓ, Biophys J, 68: 81-88, (1995).
10. Nickerson, C.A. and Achberger, E.C., Role of curved DNA in binding of Escherichia coli RNA-polymerase to promoters, Journal Of Bacteriology, 177: 5756-5761, (1995).
11. Yang, Y., Westcott, T.P., Pedersen, S.C., Tobias, I., and Olson, W.K., Effects of localized bending on DNA supercoiling, Trends Biochem Sci, 20: 313-319,(1995).
Last modified on: 1 February, 2000 by Dave Ussery