| Table 1 |
Supplementary Table 1. Examples of cross-linked OMIM records |
| Table 2 |
Supplementary Table 2. A list of 113 candidates identified by the Bayesian predictor. |
| Table 3 |
Supplementary Table 3. The methods that have been tested on linkage intervals show a varying amount of success - from 5.6 to 31.2 fold enrichment in the successful linkage intervals to 3.8 to 19.4 fold enrichment on average. |
| Table 4 |
Supplementary Table 4. Lower connectivity of the MIMs reporting linkage intervals, but no identified disease gene, than MIMs used for making the benchmarking cases. |
| Table 5 |
Supplementary Table 5. Benchmarking subset where we ranked the correct gene as number one out of all candidates in the interval. |